A Blueprint for Cross-Border Access to U.S. Investors: A New International Framework (Article Series)
by: Various Authors
ILJ Article SeriesAs one of its goals the Harvard ILJ strives to publish timely and relevant scholarship that contributes to emerging policy. In that spirit, the ILJ is proud to publish
A Blueprint for Cross-Border Access to U.S. Investors: A New International Framework, by Ethiopis Tafara and Robert Peterson, as well as commentaries from a number of leading practitioners and academics. Continue to watch
harvardilj.org for additional commentaries and discussions about this important topic.
Primary Article
A Blueprint for Cross-Border Access to U.S. Investors: A New International Framework
by Ethiopis Tafara & Robert J. Peterson
Office of Int'l. Affairs, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission*
48 H
ARV. I
NT’L. L.J. 31 (2007).
Print Responses
Commentary on A Blueprint for Cross-Border Access to U.S. Investors: A New International Framework
by Susan Wolburgh Jenah
Vice-Chair, Ontario Securities Commission (Canada)*
48 H
ARV. I
NT’L L.J. 69 (2007)
Beyond Borders: Time To Tear Down the Barriers to Global Investing
by Edward F. Greene
General Counsel, Citigroup Corporate & Investment Banking*
48 H
ARV. I
NT’L L.J. 85 (2007)
TIAA-CREF Response to A Blueprint for Cross-Border Access to U.S. Investors: A New International Framework
by George W. Madison & Stewart P. Greene
TIAA-CREF*
48 H
ARV. I
NT’L L.J. 99 (2007)
A System of Selective Substitute Compliance
by Howell E. Jackson
Professor, Harvard Law School*
48 H
ARV. I
NT’L L.J. 105 (2007)
ILJ Online Responses
The Emperor Has Unsuitable Clothes (and by the Way, He Is No Longer the Emperor)by Richard Murray
Managing Director and Chief Claims Strategist, Swiss Re and Member, U.S. Chamber of Commerce Commission on the Regulation of U.S. Capital Markets in the 21st Century*
1/28/07; 48 H
ARV. I
NT'L L.J. O
NLINE 15 (2007)
Substituted Compliance: An Australian Regulator’s Perspectiveby Greg Tanzer
Executive Director for Consumer Protection and International Relations at the Australian Securities and Investments Commission
2/5/07; 48 H
ARV. I
NT'L L.J. O
NLINE 21 (2007)
*
NOTE: The views expressed in these responses are the authors' views and should not be taken to reflect those of their respective institutions.