<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Harvard ILJ Digest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest</link>
	<description>International legal news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:10:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Along With Activists and Scholars, Discusses Transitional Justice at HLS</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/03/archbishop-desmond-tutu-along-with-activists-and-scholars-discusses-transitional-justice-at-hls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/03/archbishop-desmond-tutu-along-with-activists-and-scholars-discusses-transitional-justice-at-hls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jruby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dispute Resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Law in Domestic Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-governmental Organizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/?p=1327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, March 9, Harvard Law School, the Harvard Human Rights Program, and UNICEF will sponsor the panel discussion &#8220;Children and Transitional Justice.&#8221;
Archbishop Desmond Tutu will participate by video, along with Yasmin Sooka of the Foundation for Human Rights, South Africa, Susan Bissell, Global Chief of Child Protection for UNICEF, Sharanjeet Parmar of Global Rights, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, March 9, Harvard Law School, the Harvard Human Rights Program, and UNICEF will sponsor the panel discussion &#8220;Children and Transitional Justice.&#8221;</p>
<p>Archbishop Desmond Tutu will participate by video, along with Yasmin Sooka of the Foundation for Human Rights, South Africa, Susan Bissell, Global Chief of Child Protection for UNICEF, Sharanjeet Parmar of Global Rights, and Jens Meierhenrich of the Harvard University Department of Government.</p>
<p>Harvard Law School Dean Martha Minow will moderate.  The event will take place in the Ames Courtroom in Austin Hall from 12:00 &#8211; 1:00 pm.</p>
<p>For more information, please click <a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/calendar/?trumbaEmbed=view%3devent%26eventid%3d88532952" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/03/archbishop-desmond-tutu-along-with-activists-and-scholars-discusses-transitional-justice-at-hls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conviction of Group for Wearing Religious Clothing Overturned by European Court of Human Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/03/conviction-of-group-for-wearing-religious-clothing-overturned-by-european-court-of-human-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/03/conviction-of-group-for-wearing-religious-clothing-overturned-by-european-court-of-human-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eatkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe & CIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Courts and Tribunals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treaties and International Agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/?p=1321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Ahmet Arslan and Others v. Turkey, the European Court of Human Rights overturned, by a vote of 6-1, a 1997 decision by the Turkish courts convicting 127 Turkish nationals of breaking two laws, one against wearing headgear and the other against wearing religious clothing in public other than for religious ceremonies. The applicants, members of a religious [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <em>Ahmet Arslan and Others v. Turkey</em>, the European Court of Human Rights overturned, by a vote of 6-1, a 1997 decision by the Turkish courts convicting 127 Turkish nationals of breaking two laws, one against wearing headgear and the other against wearing religious clothing in public other than for religious ceremonies. The applicants, members of a religious group known as <em>Aczimendi tarikatÿ</em>, claimed that their conviction violated Article 9 (freedom of thought, conscience, and religion) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The ECtHR found that the decision of the Turkish courts amounted to violation of the applicants’ freedom of conscience and religion by prohibiting their expression of religion through their clothing. The court noted that it might have accepted that strict maintenance of a secular system was important for Turkey’s democracy and public safety, but that the Turkish judicial decisions at issue had failed to rely on that justification. The Court further noted that, unlike several other religious dress cases it had decided, the applicants here were punished for their religious dress in public areas that were open to all, rather than in public establishments where the state&#8217;s interest in religious neutrality might outweigh the individual&#8217;s right to manifest his or her religion.</p>
<p>The clothing mandated by <em>Aczimendi tarikatÿ</em> religious order includes a turban, baggy pants, a tunic, and a stick. Applicants had been arrested in 1996 while walking to the Kocatepe Mosque in Ankara, and filed their petition with the ECtHR in 1997.</p>
<p>For more information, see <a href="http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=html&amp;documentId=863356&amp;portal=hbkm&amp;source=externalbydocnumber&amp;table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-202449-100-ecthr-rules-against-turkey-in-aczimendi-case.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/03/conviction-of-group-for-wearing-religious-clothing-overturned-by-european-court-of-human-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Violence Mars Darfur Peace Treaty</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/03/violence-mars-darfur-peace-treaty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/03/violence-mars-darfur-peace-treaty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ideyrup</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dispute Resolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/?p=1323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 20th of this year, a major ceasefire treaty was signed between the Darfuri Justice and Equality Movement (Jem) and the government of Sudan. Jem is only one of the many militant groups in the Darfur region. However, it has presented a significant threat to the Sudanese government. President Omar al-Bashir had made the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On February 20th of this year, a major ceasefire treaty was signed between the Darfuri Justice and Equality Movement (Jem) and the government of Sudan. Jem is only one of the many militant groups in the Darfur region. However, it has presented a significant threat to the Sudanese government. President Omar al-Bashir had made the group a priority after it launched an attack against the strategically important city of Omdurman. The treaty included a possible power-sharing agreement and provisions for the return of refugees. It was welcomed by both the international community and groups with Sudan as providing a real chance for peace within the region.</p>
<p>However, less than two weeks after the signing of the treaty, there are reports that the Sudanese government has begun an offense against other rebel groups in Darfur. These clashes have given weight to demands by NGOs and other international observers that the central government include other militant groups in the peace treaty process. It is unclear whether such a proposal would be feasible, as Jem has threatened to leave the peace talks if other rebel groups are included. As a result, despite the new treaty, the prospects for peace in Darfur remain uncertain.</p>
<p>For further information, please see <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8533097.stm">here</a>, <a href="http://af.reuters.com/article/topNews/idAFJOE62209X20100303">here</a>, and <a href="http://af.reuters.com/article/topNews/idAFJOE62203E20100303">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/03/violence-mars-darfur-peace-treaty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ECtHR Rules Against Russia On Chechnya Abductions</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/ecthr-rules-against-russia-on-chechnya-abductions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/ecthr-rules-against-russia-on-chechnya-abductions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bstark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe & CIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecthr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/?p=1308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European Court of Human Rights, on February 11th, issued two non-final Chamber judgments concerning disappearances in Chechnya. In the two cases, Guluyeva and Others v. Russia and Dubayev and Bersnukayeva v. Russia, the applicants alleged that Russian servicemen had abducted their relatives and that domestic authorities failed to conduct an effective investigation into their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The European Court of Human Rights, on February 11th, issued two non-final Chamber judgments concerning disappearances in Chechnya. In the two cases, <em>Guluyeva and Others v. Russia</em> and <em>Dubayev and Bersnukayeva v. Russia</em>, the applicants alleged that Russian servicemen had abducted their relatives and that domestic authorities failed to conduct an effective investigation into their allegations. The Court found Russia in violation of Articles 2, 3, 5, and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which concern the rights to life, the prohibition against inhuman or degrading treatment, the right to liberty and security, and the right to an effective remedy, respectively. The cases come in the wake of a January 2010 reversal of Russia’s longstanding opposition to reforms meant to expedite the adjudication of cases before the Court.</p>
<p>In <em>Guluyeva</em>, Russia’s investigation into the abduction of Ramzan Guluyev, taken from his home in Chechnya on the night of Jule 12-13 2002, was suspended numerous times for Russia’s failure to identify the perpetrators. The Court awarded Mr. Guluyev’s mother 10,800 euros, and 65,000 euros to Mr. Guluyev’s mother and two sisters jointly, plus expenses. Mr. Guluyev remains missing.</p>
<p><em><em>Dubayev </em><span style="font-style: normal;">was brought by the father of Islam Dubayev and the mother of Roman Bersnukayev. Their respective sons</span></em> disappeared after submitting to a Russian Amnesty Act exculpating them from criminal liability based on their involvement in an illegal anti-Russian group. The Russian government maintains that the two men have been released. The families filed missing person reports, but the government has denied them access to case-files, despite numerous suspensions of the investigations, because it claims that revealing case-files while the investigation is in progress would violate Russian rules of criminal procedure. The Court awarded 60,000 euros to each of the applicants, plus expenses.</p>
<p>The applicants in <em>Guluyeva</em> were represented by the International Protection Centre, and in <em>Dubayev</em> by the NGO EHRAC/Memorial Human Rights Centre.</p>
<p>The judgments will become final pending the procedural protocol of the Court.</p>
<p>For further information, see <a href="http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=html&amp;documentId=862518&amp;portal=hbkm&amp;source=externalbydocnumber&amp;table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649">here</a>. For the Court&#8217;s opinion in <em>Guluyeva and Others v. Russia</em>, see <a href="http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=html&amp;documentId=862518&amp;portal=hbkm&amp;source=externalbydocnumber&amp;table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649">here</a>. For the opinion in <em>Dubayev and Bersnukayeva v. Russia</em>, see <a href="http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=html&amp;documentId=862518&amp;portal=hbkm&amp;source=externalbydocnumber&amp;table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/ecthr-rules-against-russia-on-chechnya-abductions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICC Pre-Trial Chamber Declines to Confirm Charges Against Sudanese Rebel Leader</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/icc-pre-trial-chamber-declines-to-confirm-charges-against-sudanese-rebel-leader/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/icc-pre-trial-chamber-declines-to-confirm-charges-against-sudanese-rebel-leader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dpurisch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Courts and Tribunals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Humanitarian Law (Laws of War)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/?p=1303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 7,  a pre-trial chamber of the International Criminal Court (ICC) unanimously declined to confirm charges against Sudanese rebel leader Bahar Idriss Abu Garda. Mr. Abu Garda is the first person to appear voluntarily before the court. He had been charged with being a direct or indirect co-perpetrator of several war crimes, including murder, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On February 7,  a pre-trial chamber of the International Criminal Court (ICC) unanimously declined to confirm charges against Sudanese rebel leader Bahar Idriss Abu Garda. Mr. Abu Garda is the first person to appear voluntarily before the court. He had been charged with being a direct or indirect co-perpetrator of several war crimes, including murder, attacks against a peacekeeping mission, and pillaging. All of the charges arose from his alleged involvement in an attack on Sept. 29, 2007, against the UN’s African Mission in Sudan (AMIS) in North Darfur. The Chamber found that while the allegations were sufficiently serious and while the personnel and installations associated with the AMIS peacekeeping mission were entitled to protection as civilians and civilian objects, the prosecution had produced insufficient evidence to establish substantial grounds that Mr. Abu Garda had participated in the attack.</p>
<p>The prosecution, led by Luis Moreno-Ocampo, had produced statements of anonymous witnesses. However, the Chamber found the statements to be of diminished probative value as they could not be directly challenged by the defense. The Chamber further found them to be “weak and unreliable due to the many inconsistencies,” and held that they failed to establish substantial grounds to believe that Mr. Abu Garda participated in any common plan to attack the AMIS mission. Further allegations that Mr. Abu Garda was himself involved in the attacks were found insufficient as the witness statements did not establish that he was present at the time of the attacks.</p>
<p>The Chamber’s decision not to confirm the charges presents yet another setback to the ICC’s efforts regarding the Darfur situation. The issue of Darfur was first referred to the Court by Security Council Resolution 1593 on March 31, 2005, following an International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur. Of five defendants indicted in four separate cases relating to the region, four remain outside of the Court&#8217;s custody, including Sudanese President Omar Hassan Ahmad al-Bashir. The charge of genocide against Mr. al-Bashir’s also failed to gain confirmation by the pre-trial Chamber, although the appeals Chamber recently ordered lower court to reconsider its decision in light of additional and previously disregarded evidence.</p>
<p>It is expected that, as in the al-Bashir case, the ICC prosecutor will again seek to appeal the pre-trial Chamber’s decision on Mr. Abu Garda.</p>
<p>For more information, please see the Court’s press release (<a href="http://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/exeres/97291915-0184-4EE0-9CF3-2A326C5D8BE8.htm" target="_blank">here</a>) and the Chamber’s decision (<a href="http://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/doc/doc819602.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/icc-pre-trial-chamber-declines-to-confirm-charges-against-sudanese-rebel-leader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cyprus: Further Movement Toward a Political Solution</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/cyprus-further-movement-toward-a-political-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/cyprus-further-movement-toward-a-political-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jgardner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe & CIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs and Diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/?p=1299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After numerous false starts, negotiations between the two parties to the decades-old stalemate in Cyprus seem to be moving forward again, this time with the assistance of UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. Mr. Ban Ki-moon recently made his first official visit to Cyprus. The island nation has been divided into a Greek-speaking south and a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After numerous false starts, negotiations between the two parties to the decades-old stalemate in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyprus" target="_blank">Cyprus</a> seem to be moving forward again, this time with the assistance of UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. Mr. Ban Ki-moon recently made his first official visit to Cyprus. The island nation has been divided into a Greek-speaking south and a Turkish-speaking north since 1974, when a Greek-led coup sought to annex the island to Greece, prompting a Turkish invasion that claimed the top 37% of the island. The north, which calls itself the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), has only been recognized by Turkey, and has lagged behind the impressive economic development of the south, which enjoys broad international recognition and now represents the island in the European Union. UN peacekeepers patrol the unofficial border between the two sides, and the island is heavily militarized. During his visit, Mr. Ban Ki-Moon visited with leaders from both the Turkish and Greek factions.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/archives/781" target="_blank">Previous talks</a> have been derailed by a number of contentious issues; the most serious recent attempt at unification, in 2004, produced an agreement which was subsequently ratified in a referendum by the north but rejected, under the hard-line presidency of Tassos Papadopoulos, by the south. Papadopoulos has since been replaced by the more moderate Demetris Christofias, but the Turkish Cypriot leader, Mehmet Ali Talat, now faces a challenge in upcoming elections from a more hard-line candidate. This has ramped up the pressure for a solution, as has the fact that the ongoing stalemate has dimmed Turkey’s prospects in its own bid for EU accession.</p>
<p>Legal issues relating to the conflict stem originally from the question of whether the 1974 Turkish invasion was justified as a matter of international law. Greek Cypriots argue that the invasion was a clear violation of the <a href="http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/" target="_blank">UN Charter</a>, which prohibits aggressive war; their argument is supported by the fact that no multilateral body authorized the action. Turkish Cypriots counter that Turkey’s response was justified, as a form of self-defense, by the prospect of the island’s annexation to Greece, and, as a form of humanitarian intervention, by longstanding intercommunal violence directed toward the Turkish-speaking minority. Going forward, both political and legal solutions will be needed to address issues including the division of contested territory, the presence of Turkish forces, reparations for lost property, and power sharing under a proposed federation.</p>
<p>For more information, please click <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/world/europe/02cyprus.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/cyprus-further-movement-toward-a-political-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Developing Nations Doubt US Commitment to Trade Agreement</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/developing-nations-doubt-us-commitment-to-trade-agreement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/developing-nations-doubt-us-commitment-to-trade-agreement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jruby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treaties and International Agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/?p=1285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two trade ministers from the developing world have publicly voiced doubts about the willingness and ability of the United States to reach a global trade agreement during 2010.  Their criticism calls into question the ability of leaders of the G20 nations to follow through on their September 2009 promise to conclude a trade agreement this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two trade ministers from the developing world have publicly voiced doubts about the willingness and ability of the United States to reach a global trade agreement during 2010.  Their criticism calls into question the ability of leaders of the G20 nations to follow through on their September 2009 promise to conclude a trade agreement this year.</p>
<p>Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, South African trade minister Rob Davies cited the presence of relatively junior American officials at an ongoing round of trade talks and American refusal to base its present bargaining positions on prior compromises reached as part of the Doha Development Round negotiations as evidence that the United States is unlikely to be part of any trade agreement reached this year.  Davies also noted domestic political opposition as a factor in American hesitancy to reach a trade deal.</p>
<p>Rachid Mohamed Rachid, trade minister of Egypt, also recently stated that he doubted that the United States would be part of a trade agreement this year.</p>
<p>Developing nations had been pressing the World Trade Organization for an agreement limiting industrialized nations&#8217; ability to subsidize agricultural exports, among other provisions.  Such an agreement now appears unlikely.</p>
<p>For more information, please click <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLDE60S0IT20100129" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/developing-nations-doubt-us-commitment-to-trade-agreement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Albie Sachs Speaks at HLS: Friday, February 5</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/justice-albie-sachs-speaks-at-hls-friday-february-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/justice-albie-sachs-speaks-at-hls-friday-february-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jruby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/?p=1292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice Albie Sachs, who served on the Constitutional Court of South Africa until October 2009 and author of the recently published book The Strange Alchemy of Life and Law, will speak at Harvard Law School on February 5 at 3:00 pm in Austin North.
The program is sponsored by the Harvard Law School Office of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice Albie Sachs, who served on the Constitutional Court of South Africa until October 2009 and author of the recently published book <em>The Strange Alchemy of Life and Law</em>, will speak at Harvard Law School on February 5 at 3:00 pm in Austin North.</p>
<p>The program is sponsored by the Harvard Law School Office of the Dean, International Legal Studies Program, and Office of Public Interest Advising.</p>
<p>For more information, please click <a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/calendar/#/?i=1" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/justice-albie-sachs-speaks-at-hls-friday-february-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Optimistic Prospects for ECtHR Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/optimistic-prospects-for-ecthr-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/optimistic-prospects-for-ecthr-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eatkinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/?p=1288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking at a press conference in Strasbourg, Jean-Paul Costa, President of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), expressed three reasons for optimism about reform measures for the Court in 2010.
Firstly, the Treaty of Lisbon opens the way for the European Union’s participation in the European Convention on Human Rights, strengthening the role of human [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking at a press conference in Strasbourg, Jean-Paul Costa, President of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), expressed three reasons for optimism about reform measures for the Court in 2010.</p>
<p>Firstly, the Treaty of Lisbon opens the way for the European Union’s participation in the European Convention on Human Rights, strengthening the role of human rights in Europe. Dedicated “to enhancing the efficiency and democratic legitimacy of the Union and to improving the coherence of its action,” the treaty was written in 2007. It entered into force in December 2009, a month after it was ratified by the last remaining member of the European Union, the Czech Republic. The treaty amends the Treaty on the European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community into a constitutional-type document intended to strengthen and guide the European Union.</p>
<p>Secondly, in January Russia ratified Protocol 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights, which is designed to overhaul the procedures of the ECHR. Russia was the last of the forty-seven members of the Council of Europe to ratify the Protocol, which has been on the table since 2006.</p>
<p>Finally, in February 2010 a conference on the future of the ECHR will be held in Interlaken, Switzerland. The conference will draw together member states to celebrate the 50<sup>th</sup> anniversary of the ECHR and to reaffirm their commitment to the protection of human rights in Europe, while outlining a roadmap for the Court’s future development. Currently, more than 100,000 cases are pending before the Court.</p>
<p>For further information, please click <a href="http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=html&amp;documentId=861681&amp;portal=hbkm&amp;source=externalbydocnumber&amp;table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649">here</a>, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6901353.stm" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">here</span></a>, and <a href="http://www.norway-coe.org/general/hr/echr/The-future-of-ECHR/" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">here</span></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/02/optimistic-prospects-for-ecthr-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China enters ASEAN-China FTA ready to cooperate</title>
		<link>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/01/china-enters-asean-china-fta-ready-to-cooperate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/01/china-enters-asean-china-fta-ready-to-cooperate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lhayden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia & the Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs and Diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treaties and International Agreements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/?p=1282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 1st 2010, a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) took effect. The newly formed FTA is the third largest in the world, with a GDP of $6.6 trillion and a population of 1.9 billion. Prior to the agreement in 2008, China was ASEAN&#8217;s third-largest trading [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 1st 2010, a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) took effect. The newly formed FTA is the third largest in the world, with a GDP of $6.6 trillion and a population of 1.9 billion. Prior to the agreement in 2008, China was ASEAN&#8217;s third-largest trading partner.</p>
<p>Despite the concerns of members like Indonesia over the impact that the agreement will have on domestic industry, ASEAN is confident that China will act cooperatively in order to ensure mutual gains. The State Councilor of the People&#8217;s Republic of China, H.E. Dai Bingguo, recently met with the ASEAN Secretariat to discuss China&#8217;s commitment to aid in the transition process, confirming China’s position in a speech before more than 300 dignitaries. This was the first time that a high-level Chinese Diplomat visited the ASEAN Secretariat.</p>
<p>Further, as the Secretary General of ASEAN notes, there are mechanisms such as anti-dumping safeguards in the FTA to protect the domestic markets of ASEAN member states.</p>
<p>For further information, please click <a href="http://www.aseansec.org/24209.htm">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harvardilj.org/digest/2010/01/china-enters-asean-china-fta-ready-to-cooperate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
