Universal Exceptionalism in International Law

A trope of international law scholarship is that the United States is an “exceptionalist” nation, one that takes a distinctive (frequently hostile, unilateralist, or hypocritical) stance toward international law. However, all major powers are similarly “exceptionalist,” in the sense that they take distinctive approaches to international law that reflect their values and interests. We illustrate these arguments with discussions of China, the European Union, and the United States. Charges of international-law exceptionalism betray an undefended assumption that one particular view of international law (for scholars, usually the European view) is universally valid.

Read full article (PDF)

2 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Anton’s Weekly Digest of International Law Scholarship, Vol. 2, No. 6 (10 Feb 2011) | Don Anton
  2. Anton’s Weekly Digest of International Law Scholarship, Vol. 2, No. 6 (10 Feb 2011) | Anton's Weekly Digest of International Law

Comments are closed.